As Vice President Kamala Harris steps into the presidential race, controversy arises over her role in handling the border crisis. Axios recently faced backlash after publishing an article claiming Harris was never designated as the “border czar.” This assertion contradicts previous references by the same outlet, prompting criticism and accusations of attempting to rewrite history.
Social media users were quick to highlight the inconsistency, leading to an editor’s note from Axios: “Editor’s note: This article has been updated and clarified to note that Axios was among the news outlets that incorrectly labeled Harris a ‘border czar’ in 2021.”
The outlet now claims Harris’s task was to address the root causes of migration from Latin America, not directly manage border security. However, this contradicts earlier reports, such as one from NBC, that framed her role as resolving the immigration crisis at the border.
Critics argue that this revisionist narrative aims to protect Harris’s political image as she runs for president. The backlash reflects the ongoing debate about her effectiveness and accountability in managing immigration issues. As Harris campaigns for the highest office, her past actions and performance at the border will remain under intense scrutiny.
