Loomer Doubles Down On Criticism Of Bondi’s Zimmerman Case Involvement

Laura Loomer has unleashed a wave of criticism against Attorney General Pam Bondi, blasting her over past legal decisions—specifically her involvement in the prosecution of George Zimmerman. While Loomer initially focused on Bondi’s handling of Epstein-related files, she is now using the moment to remind conservatives of Bondi’s role in a case that many believe should never have gone to trial.

Loomer argues that Bondi’s appointment of State Attorney Angela Corey to prosecute Zimmerman was not a neutral legal decision but rather a response to pressure from then-Attorney General Eric Holder. She contends that Corey built a politically driven case, leaving out crucial photographic evidence that would have supported Zimmerman’s self-defense claim.

Loomer has framed Bondi’s actions as part of a broader effort by the Obama administration to shape public perception of the case. She points to Obama’s own statements on the matter as evidence that the prosecution had political motives. Instead of resisting this pressure, Loomer claims, Bondi facilitated it by selecting Corey to handle the case.

As Loomer ramped up her criticism of Bondi on X, she soon found herself blocked by Bondi’s official account. Loomer immediately called attention to the move, arguing that it violates free speech protections since Bondi uses her account for official government communications.

Loomer has also revived past allegations regarding Bondi’s foreign connections, highlighting her previous lobbying work on behalf of Qatar. With Bondi already facing conservative frustration over the Epstein files, Loomer’s criticisms have widened the conversation to include Bondi’s entire record, drawing renewed scrutiny.